NB It should be remembered that objects 'acquired' in the 1880s were often actually acquired much earlier as this total includes items transferred from the Ashmolean and the OUMNH both of which could have been (and probably were) acquired prior to 1884.
- Table of Contents
- Compare different Continents Statistics
- Introduction to comparative continental statistics
- Compare Colonial Status
- Colonial Status Part 1
- Colonial Status Part 2
- Colonial Status Part 3
- Compare Size of Collections
- Classes comparison
- Classes & Continents
- Classes & Decades Part 1
- Classes & Decades Part 2
- Continents, classes, decades Part 1
- Continents, classes, decades Part 2
- Continents, classes, decades Part 3
- Continents, classes, decades Comparison Part 2
- Decades, continents, geographical spread
- Archaeological & Ethnographic comparison per continent
- Continent / Decade Snapshots
- Archaeological & Ethnographic artefacts by continent and British colonial affiliation
- Archaeological & Ethnographic comparison per continent
- Continent / Tools and weapons comparison
Comparison of Geographical statistics regarding the Pitt Rivers Museum's collections up to 1945 - Decades of acquisition
[article ID:182]
Is the pattern of acquisition different for archaeological and ethnographic objects over the decades between 1884 and 1945?
[article ID:183]
ESRC 'Relational Museum'
October 2003